пинко Секреты
пинко Секреты
Blog Article
Бонусов у букмекера – достаточно миллиончик, ес в свой черед приветственные, как и постоянные, в свой черед временные. До каких пор можно найти из бонусов:
Или включите автоматические обновления в настройках вашего устройства для автоматического обновления.
О проектеКонтактыПартнерская программаДля агентовПользовательское соглашениеПолитика конфиденциальностиЭнциклопедияКарта сайтаНаши экспертыНаши вакансии
The player from the Netherlands had an active self-exclusion in a sister casino due to a gambling problem. The player believes that he should have been banned from this casino too. Since he did not request self-exclusion from this casino, he decided to close the complaint.
Despite this, the casino had cancelled the withdrawals citing they exceeded the daily limit. The player later reported that one withdrawal had been successful and decided to close the complaint. The issue had been marked as resolved by the Complaints Team.
You can imagine what happened with the 130 euros, convert 1500 euros with 130 euros. That doesn't work, you have the option to buy free spins, but you can do that in the 5 days only once. It happened as it had to, the money is gone. I still don't know who of the ladies was right.
The casino did not provide a reason for the account closure and ignored the player's follow-up queries. After the Complaints Team had intervened, the casino had requested additional documents from the player for verification. Upon receiving the documents, the casino had processed the player's refund. The player had confirmed receipt of the funds, leading to the successful resolution of the complaint.
The player from Germany is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. The winnings were received in a short time and the complaint is now resolved.
When determining the casino's Safety Index, we consider all complaints received through our Complaint Resolution Center, as well as the здесь complaints submitted through other websites and channels.
The player from Italy had made segmented withdrawal requests due to withdrawal limits. While the requests had been paid simultaneously, the player had received only one transfer of €2000. The player had successfully completed all necessary KYC verifications and had claimed the winnings were not bonus-related.
The player from Portugal had reported a delay in her withdrawal request which had been initiated on April 30th, exceeding the stated 72-hour processing period. She had also mentioned inconsistent responses from the casino's chat support. Despite the casino's assurance that the payment had been processed, the player's withdrawals were canceled and the funds were returned to her gaming wallet.
No player complaints or very low value of withheld winnings in complaints in relation to the casino's size
So far so good! After 3 payouts, a bank suddenly asks for a document with a transactions ID. Everyone knows that there is no such thing in Germany!
The player from Bulgaria had encountered issues with his withdrawal requests at an online casino. Despite having verified his profile, his withdrawal requests had been repeatedly rejected without explanation. He had attempted to withdraw his winnings through various means, including three different bank accounts, but all attempts were unsuccessful.